If you’ve followed this series so far, you already know the punchline: most organizations don’t undertest because they don’t believe in testing. They undertest because the way testing shows up in the business makes it hard to
By now, the pattern should be clear. When organizations undertest, it’s rarely because they don’t understand the value of testing. It’s because something about the way testing shows up in the business makes it hard to sustain.
In Part 1 of this series, we talked about why organizations reduce testing cadence when they’re afraid the findings will outpace their ability to fix them. In Part 2, we looked at the budget angle and how outdated purchasing
In Part 1 of this series, we looked at how organizations limit testing because they’re worried they’ll create remediation backlogs they can’t close. In Part 2, we addressed the myth that frequent testing is “too expensive” and
The Myth That Continuous Testing Is “Too Expensive” In Part 1 of this series, we talked about the most common reason organizations slow down security testing: it’s not that they don’t believe in testing, it’s that they’re
For decades, security leaders have repeated a familiar refrain: you can’t secure what you can’t see. And yet, many organizations knowingly limit how often they perform vulnerability scanning and penetration testing, even as
How to Beat the Odds: Balancing Vulnerability Assessments, Penetration Tests, and Automated Testing In sports betting, covering the spread isn’t about luck. The smartest bettors study the numbers, track injuries, watch trends,
The holiday season is a time for giving, gratitude, and, unfortunately, grifting. While most of us are busy wrapping gifts and planning gatherings, cybercriminals are hard at work cooking up new scams designed to take advantage
A mature cybersecurity posture requires structure. Particularly with the growing complexity and accelerating pace of change that characterizes the modern IT landscape, being unorganized will make it all too easy for a key