Blog

Small and medium businesses are facing more cyberattacks than ever before. According to recent research from Sage and IDC, one in two SMBs experienced a security incident or data breach in the past year. Atlantic Data Security

At this point in the series, a pattern should be hard to miss. Organizations don’t only test infrequently. Over time, they learn to live with what testing reveals.

By this point in the series, one pattern should be unmistakable: many organizations do test. They do find issues. And yet, testing cadence still stalls.

By now, it should be clear that a lack of testing cadence isn’t just a tooling or a budget problem. Sometimes the biggest barrier is quieter than that. It sits within the organization, in how teams interpret results, how

Who has access to your critical systems?

Going Beyond Complaince Driven Testing Going Beyond Complaince

If you’ve followed this series so far, you already know the punchline: most organizations don’t undertest because they don’t believe in testing. They undertest because the way testing shows up in the business makes it hard to

Most organizations do not set out to build an overcomplicated and inefficient security stack. It happens the same way clutter builds up in a garage. A new need shows up; you buy the right tool for the moment; it works, and you

By now, the pattern should be clear. When organizations undertest, it’s rarely because they don’t understand the value of testing. It’s because something about the way testing shows up in the business makes it hard to sustain.

In Part 1 of this series, we talked about why organizations reduce testing cadence when they’re afraid the findings will outpace their ability to fix them. In Part 2, we looked at the budget angle and how outdated purchasing